New York advances food disclosure and tent flame-retardant bills to governor

Chemical Watch News

Separate measures addressing PFAS and gas stoves also move forward

Personal care
Chemical industry
Retail
Metals
PFAS
Phthalates
Chemical restrictions
Food & drink
Substances of concern
Administrative & legal structure
Chemical management
Classification, labelling, packaging & SDSs
Public policy
Pre-market obligation
Product requirements & management
New York
Flame retardant chemicals

places - Manhattan - New York © Tierney stock.adobe

New York lawmakers have advanced a slate of chemical-related measures at the close of the state’s 2026 legislative session, sending bills targeting flame retardants in tents, food additive disclosures and other product controls to the governor for consideration.

At least seven such bills passed the New York State Legislature before its session ended on 5 June, highlighting a continued focus by US state lawmakers on taking targeted, substance-specific action.

Governor Kathy Hochul (D) may now sign them into law, veto them, or return them to the legislature with recommended changes.

Under the New York constitution, she typically has ten days to act once a bill is formally presented – although measures are often delivered several months after the end of the legislative session. If she takes no action once a bill is presented to her, it may become law without her signature.

Meanwhile, several other bills addressing cosmetics, PFAS in consumer products and related issues failed to advance, reflecting a broader pattern in the state in recent years, in which certain chemical legislation has struggled to advance (see box).

Tents, food and more

The No Toxics Tent Act (AB 7875/SB 9704) is one of several bills that now head to the governor’s desk. It passed the Senate by a 60-1 vote on 3 June.

If enacted, it would end flame-resistance requirements for certain recreational and children’s tents, echoing other recent North American efforts to reduce the use of flame-retardant substances in tent materials.

Another bill (AB 7594/SB 3852), which passed the Assembly unanimously on 4 June, would prohibit, from 2028, the sale of playground surfacing materials that contain intentionally added PFAS, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) or lead, as well as materials in which those substances are present above concentration limits to be set by state regulators. New York lawmakers previously pursued similar legislation in 2024.

A third bill, the Food Safety and Chemical Disclosure Act (AB 1556/SB 1239), which advanced in April, would require companies to disclose safety information for food ingredients brought to market in New York under the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s 'generally recognised as safe' (GRAS) framework, which allows manufacturers to self-affirm the safety of many ingredients without prior agency review. The legislation would also prohibit FD&C Red No 3, potassium bromate and propylparaben in food sold in the state.

At least four other chemical-related bills also advanced to the governor. They include:

  • the PFAS Discharge Disclosure Act (AB 5832/SB 4574), which would require certain industrial facilities and wastewater treatment systems to monitor PFAS discharges and publicly report the results;
  • AB 8634/SB 3207, which would align New York with federal drinking water standards by setting maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) of 4ppt for PFOA and PFOS, and 10ppt for additional PFAS, while directing the state to assess cumulative exposure risks for the chemicals in drinking water;
  • the Healthy Homes Right to Know Act (AB 73/SB 1280), which would require warning labels on new gas stoves to indicate that the appliances can emit unsafe levels of nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, benzene and formaldehyde; and
  • the Baby Food and Infant Formula Safety and Transparency Act (AB 9026/SB 8701), which would require manufacturers to test baby food and infant formula for certain metals, prohibit the sale of products exceeding metal concentration limits to be set by state regulators, and publicly disclose contaminant levels with QR code labelling.

Measures that did not pass

At least four other bills addressing chemicals failed to survive the legislative session.

The most notable was the Beauty Justice Act (AB 2054/SB 2057). It passed the Senate but failed to advance out of the Assembly for the second straight year after drawing industry opposition. The bill would have prohibited the sale of cosmetics and personal care products containing certain intentionally added substances, including metals, PFAS, phthalates, parabens and formaldehyde.

Bobbi Wilding, executive director of NGO Clean+Healthy, told Chemical Watch News & Insight that supporters will "continue working to pass the Beauty Justice Act next year".

Other bills that failed to advance include:

  • AB 7738/SB 9073, which would prohibit the sale of certain consumer goods – including textiles, cookware and cleaning products – that contain intentionally added PFAS;
  • SB 7821, which would require warning labels on new children’s products, mattresses and upholstered furniture that contain fibreglass, and would prohibit its use in certain reupholstering and repair applications; and
  • the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act (AB 1749/SB 1464), which would have established an extended producer responsibility (EPR) programme for packaging waste and phased out certain substances in packaging, including PFAS, phthalates, bisphenols and metals.

New York’s two-year legislative cycle ended this year, with a new session set to begin in January 2027. Bills that did not advance this year cannot be carried over and must be reintroduced in the next session.